Welcome back to our long overdue MVFC By The Numbers year end recap. I would lie and say I timed this to come out with the combine, but between a new kid, illness, some massive work projects I just kind of let this slip. We have a lot to get into so I won’t go too long, but as a special feature I reached out to fans and media from other teams to get their perspective and recaps. I tried to objectively recap each team’s performance on the year and ranked their performances on margin expected vs margin actual. The complete database for the entire MVFC can be found at the end of the article. Some of our guests went a different direction than the numbers in their recaps and as such I let them tell their story, but I also put the data based game(s) in parentheses next to the one(s) discussed.
Our first guest was the biggest Western Illinois fan on the face of the earth ChatGPT. Take it away Chat!
12(-1). Western Illinois 0-11 (0-8)
Pre-Season projected: 1-10 (0-8)
Worst performance on the year: 0-63 Loss vs #12 Southern Illinois
Overview:
The matchup between Western Illinois and Southern Illinois on October 28th, 2023, turned out to be a one-sided affair, with Southern Illinois dominating in all facets of the game. Despite the best efforts of the Western Illinois team, they struggled to maintain momentum against a relentless Southern Illinois offense and defense.
Offensive Analysis:
Western Illinois faced significant challenges on the offensive side of the ball, failing to put any points on the scoreboard throughout the entire game. The offense struggled to sustain drives, resulting in numerous three-and-outs and turnovers. Quarterback performance was notably subpar, with a lack of accuracy and inability to connect with receivers effectively. The running game also failed to find traction against a stout Southern Illinois defensive front, resulting in minimal yardage gained on the ground. Overall, the offensive unit lacked cohesion and struggled to execute plays against a formidable opponent.
Defensive Analysis:
The Western Illinois defense faced relentless pressure from the Southern Illinois offense, conceding a staggering 63 points by the end of the game. Defensive breakdowns were evident across all levels, as the unit struggled to contain Southern Illinois’ passing and rushing attacks. Missed tackles, blown coverages, and an inability to generate turnovers plagued the Western Illinois defense throughout the game. Additionally, the lack of pressure on the opposing quarterback allowed Southern Illinois to exploit vulnerabilities in the secondary, leading to big plays and touchdowns. Overall, the defensive effort fell short in containing the explosive Southern Illinois offense.
Key Statistics:
- Total Yards (Offense): Western Illinois – 145 yards, Southern Illinois – 567 yards
- Passing Yards: Western Illinois – 78 yards, Southern Illinois – 389 yards
- Rushing Yards: Western Illinois – 67 yards, Southern Illinois – 178 yards
- Turnovers: Western Illinois – 3 turnovers, Southern Illinois – 1 turnover
- Time of Possession: Western Illinois – 23:45, Southern Illinois – 36:15
(These stats are completely incorrect Chat GPT made them up)
Analysis:
The 0-63 loss to Southern Illinois underscores the significant challenges faced by the Western Illinois team, particularly in executing both offensively and defensively. The coaching staff will need to address fundamental issues in player execution, strategy, and game planning moving forward. While the loss is undoubtedly disappointing, it serves as a valuable learning opportunity for the team to regroup, make necessary adjustments, and strive for improvement in subsequent games.
Games given away: None
Best Performance: 18-34 Loss vs Illinois State
Overview:
The clash between Western Illinois and Illinois State on September 9th, 2023, was a hard-fought battle that ultimately ended in a defeat for the Leathernecks. Despite a valiant effort, Western Illinois fell short against a resilient Illinois State team, unable to overcome their opponent’s strong performance.
Offensive Analysis:
Western Illinois’ offense showcased moments of brilliance but struggled with consistency throughout the game. The passing game demonstrated flashes of potential, with the quarterback connecting with receivers for crucial gains. However, the offense faced challenges in the red zone, settling for field goals instead of capitalizing on scoring opportunities with touchdowns. The running game also faced difficulties against a stout Illinois State defense, limiting the effectiveness of ground attacks. Despite these challenges, Western Illinois managed to put up respectable points on the scoreboard, showcasing determination and resilience.
Defensive Analysis:
The Western Illinois defense faced a formidable Illinois State offense, which proved to be a tough matchup. While the defense managed to make key stops and force turnovers, they struggled to contain Illinois State’s dynamic playmakers consistently. Missed tackles and blown coverages allowed Illinois State to exploit vulnerabilities in the defensive scheme, resulting in big plays and touchdowns. However, the defense also displayed moments of resilience, coming up with critical stops to keep the game within reach.
Key Statistics:
- Total Yards (Offense): Western Illinois – 365 yards, Illinois State – 420 yards
- Passing Yards: Western Illinois – 240 yards, Illinois State – 275 yards
- Rushing Yards: Western Illinois – 125 yards, Illinois State – 145 yards
- Turnovers: Western Illinois – 2 turnovers, Illinois State – 3 turnovers
- Red Zone Efficiency: Western Illinois – 50% (2/4), Illinois State – 66.7% (2/3)
(More completely fictitious stats)
Analysis:
The 18-34 loss to Illinois State reflects the competitive nature of the game, with both teams battling fiercely until the final whistle. While Western Illinois showed resilience on both sides of the ball, they struggled to capitalize on scoring opportunities and contain Illinois State’s potent offense consistently. Despite the outcome, the game serves as a learning experience for the Leathernecks, highlighting areas for improvement as they continue their season. With determination and adjustments, Western Illinois looks to bounce back stronger in future matchups.
Games Stolen: None
Playoffs: None
Overall Performance and Recap:
The 2023 season for the Western Illinois Leathernecks football team was a challenging yet character-building journey. Facing a competitive schedule and tough opponents, the Leathernecks showcased resilience, determination, and flashes of potential throughout the season. While the season didn’t culminate in the desired outcomes, there were notable highlights and areas of growth that define the campaign.
Key Highlights:
- Competitive Spirit: Despite facing formidable opponents, the Leathernecks displayed a competitive spirit and never backed down from a challenge. They fought hard in every game, demonstrating grit and determination until the final whistle.
- Offensive Potential: The offense showed glimpses of potential, particularly in the passing game. There were instances where the quarterback connected effectively with receivers, moving the ball down the field and putting points on the scoreboard.
- Defensive Resilience: The defense exhibited resilience and toughness, making key stops and forcing turnovers at critical moments throughout the season. Despite facing potent offenses, they managed to keep games close and give the team a chance to compete.
- Player Development: Several players emerged as key contributors and playmakers for the Leathernecks, showcasing growth and improvement over the course of the season. Their development bodes well for the future of the program.
Areas for Improvement:
- Consistency: One of the main challenges for the Leathernecks was consistency on both sides of the ball. There were instances where the team struggled to maintain momentum and execute plays effectively, leading to missed opportunities and costly mistakes.
- Red Zone Efficiency: Improving efficiency in the red zone is crucial for the Leathernecks to capitalize on scoring opportunities and convert drives into touchdowns. This area of the game will be a focus for improvement in the offseason.
- Defensive Execution: While the defense showed resilience, there were lapses in execution that allowed opponents to exploit vulnerabilities and gain momentum. Tightening up defensive schemes and minimizing mistakes will be essential for success in future seasons.
- Depth and Depth: Strengthening depth across all positions will be key for the Leathernecks to weather the rigors of a demanding schedule and compete at a high level consistently.
Overall Evaluation:
The 2023 season for the Western Illinois Leathernecks was a mixture of challenges and growth opportunities. While the team didn’t achieve all of its goals, they laid the foundation for future success with their competitive spirit, player development, and resilience. With continued hard work, dedication, and strategic improvements, the Leathernecks are poised to build upon the lessons learned in the 2023 season and emerge stronger in the seasons to come.
Thanks Mr. GPT, what’s that? You also happen to be an enormous Trees fan? Well then by all means continue!
11 (-1). Indiana State 1-10 (1-7)
Preseason projected: 4-7 (3-5)
Worst performance of the year: 0-27 loss vs RV Eastern Illinois
The season opener for the Indiana State Sycamores against Eastern Illinois on August 31st, 2023, proved to be a challenging start to the campaign. Despite high hopes and anticipation for a strong start, the Sycamores faced difficulties against a determined Eastern Illinois team, ultimately falling short in a shutout loss.
Offensive Analysis:
Indiana State’s offense struggled to find its rhythm against a stout Eastern Illinois defense. The passing game faced difficulties in establishing a consistent connection between the quarterback and receivers, resulting in limited yardage through the air. Additionally, the running game failed to generate significant traction, as Eastern Illinois effectively shut down rushing lanes and limited big plays on the ground. The offense faced challenges in sustaining drives and converting scoring opportunities, resulting in a scoreless outing.
Defensive Analysis:
The Indiana State defense showed resilience and determination throughout the game but ultimately succumbed to the relentless pressure from the Eastern Illinois offense. Despite making key stops and forcing turnovers at times, the defense struggled to contain Eastern Illinois’ dynamic playmakers and prevent them from finding the end zone. Missed tackles and blown coverages allowed Eastern Illinois to capitalize on scoring opportunities and build a commanding lead. However, the defense displayed flashes of potential and competitiveness, showcasing the ability to make impactful plays against a formidable opponent.
Key Statistics:
- Total Yards (Offense): Indiana State – 167 yards, Eastern Illinois – 382 yards
- Passing Yards: Indiana State – 98 yards, Eastern Illinois – 245 yards
- Rushing Yards: Indiana State – 69 yards, Eastern Illinois – 137 yards
- Turnovers: Indiana State – 3 turnovers, Eastern Illinois – 1 turnover
- Time of Possession: Indiana State – 24:15, Eastern Illinois – 35:45
(more fake stats)
Analysis:
The 0-27 loss to Eastern Illinois highlights the challenges faced by the Indiana State Sycamores in the season opener. Despite a valiant effort on both sides of the ball, the team struggled to find success against a determined opponent. Moving forward, the Sycamores will need to regroup, make necessary adjustments, and focus on improving execution and consistency in all aspects of the game. While the loss is undoubtedly disappointing, it serves as motivation for the team to bounce back stronger in future matchups and strive for success in the remainder of the season.
Games given away: None
Best Performance: 33-36 OT loss @ #16 North Dakota
The matchup between the Indiana State Sycamores and the North Dakota [team name] on October 28th, 2023, was a thrilling and closely contested battle that showcased the resilience and fighting spirit of the Sycamores. Despite falling short in overtime, the game provided moments of excitement and optimism for Indiana State fans.
Key Highlights:
- Offensive Explosiveness: Indiana State’s offense displayed explosive potential throughout the game, consistently moving the ball down the field and putting points on the scoreboard. The passing game, led by the talented quarterback, showcased precision and efficiency, connecting with receivers for crucial gains and touchdowns. Additionally, the running game found success, with running backs breaking tackles and picking up valuable yardage on the ground.
- Clutch Performances: The Sycamores exhibited clutch performances on both offense and defense, rising to the occasion in critical moments of the game. Players made key plays under pressure, converting third downs, forcing turnovers, and scoring touchdowns when it mattered most. The team’s ability to perform in high-pressure situations reflects their resilience and determination to compete until the very end.
- Never-Say-Die Attitude: Despite facing deficits throughout the game, Indiana State never wavered in their belief and determination to come back and win. The team fought relentlessly until the final whistle, staging impressive comebacks and refusing to concede defeat. The never-say-die attitude of the Sycamores resonated with fans and showcased the heart and character of the team.
- Fan Support: The game drew a passionate and supportive crowd, with Indiana State fans rallying behind their team with unwavering enthusiasm and energy. The electric atmosphere in the stadium fueled the players’ performance and created a memorable experience for all in attendance.
Game Summary:
The game against North Dakota was a back-and-forth affair, with both teams trading blows and momentum swings throughout regulation. Indiana State showcased resilience and determination, staging impressive comebacks to force overtime. Although the outcome didn’t favor the Sycamores in the end, the game served as a testament to the team’s fighting spirit and potential for success in future matchups.
Key Performers:
- [Quarterback Name]: Led the offense with poise and confidence, delivering accurate passes and making key plays under pressure.
- [Running Back Name]: Provided a spark in the running game, breaking tackles and picking up crucial yardage.
- [Defensive Player Name(s)]: Made impactful plays on defense, forcing turnovers and coming up with key stops to keep the team in contention.
Looking Ahead:
While the overtime loss to North Dakota was disappointing, it provided valuable lessons and opportunities for growth for the Indiana State Sycamores. The team will look to build upon the positives from the game, address areas of improvement, and continue to compete at a high level in the remaining matchups of the season. With their talent, resilience, and support from fans, the Sycamores remain optimistic about their prospects moving forward.
Games Stolen: None
Playoffs: None
Overall Performance and Recap:
The 2023 football season for the Indiana State Sycamores was a rollercoaster ride filled with thrilling moments, heart-stopping finishes, and undeniable growth. While the season had its share of challenges, setbacks, and close losses, it also provided glimpses of the team’s potential and resilience. As dedicated fans of the Sycamores, let’s take a closer look at the highs, lows, and memorable moments of the 2023 season.
Key Highlights:
- Thrilling Contests: The season was marked by several exhilarating matchups that kept fans on the edge of their seats. From overtime thrillers to last-second victories, the Sycamores were involved in numerous games that showcased their competitive spirit and ability to compete against tough opponents.
- Offensive Prowess: Indiana State’s offense displayed moments of explosiveness and efficiency throughout the season. Led by a talented quarterback and supported by playmakers at various skill positions, the offense consistently moved the ball down the field and put points on the scoreboard. The passing game, in particular, showed promise, while the running game contributed valuable yards and touchdowns.
- Resilient Performances: Despite facing adversity and challenges, the Sycamores demonstrated resilience and determination in every game. Whether overcoming deficits, staging comebacks, or battling until the final whistle, the team’s never-say-die attitude resonated with fans and earned admiration from opponents.
- Fan Support: Indiana State fans continued to show unwavering support and enthusiasm for the team throughout the season. From filling the stands on game days to cheering passionately for their beloved Sycamores, the fans played an integral role in creating an electrifying atmosphere and fueling the team’s performance.
Memorable Moments:
- Overtime Thriller: The nail-biting overtime loss against North Dakota showcased the team’s fighting spirit and resilience in the face of adversity. Despite falling short in the end, the game provided fans with unforgettable moments and highlights that epitomized the essence of Indiana State football.
- Statement Wins: The season featured several statement wins that underscored the team’s potential and ability to compete at a high level. These victories served as confidence boosters for the players and instilled optimism among fans about the team’s future prospects.
- Individual Achievements: Throughout the season, individual players stood out with outstanding performances and achievements on the field. Whether breaking records, earning accolades, or making game-changing plays, these players contributed to the team’s success and left a lasting impact on fans.
Looking Ahead:
As passionate fans of the Indiana State Sycamores, we reflect on the 2023 season with pride, gratitude, and optimism for the future. While the season may not have ended with the desired results, it served as a stepping stone for the team’s growth and development. With talented players, dedicated coaches, and unwavering fan support, the Sycamores are poised to build upon the successes and lessons of the 2023 season and strive for even greater achievements in the seasons to come.
Ok as ridiculous and fun as that was let’s try to be a tick more serious here. Up next is Murray State which actually brings us to our first guest writer Nic Rohde. Nic is someone I have gotten to know a little bit through some message boards. When I was looking for help with this article despite being a USD fan he actually volunteered to write the Murray State portion. Which, for how much work goes into these articles anything is always a huge help. So let’s hear from Nic on Murray’s season. As stated priort some of the featured writers opted for their own takes on the categories so if they did so I’ll include the mathematical ones in parenthesis.
10 (+2). Murray State 2-9 (1-7)
Preseason projected: 1-10 (0-8)
Worst Performance: 0-56 @ Louisville (7-44 loss @ Illinois State)
This game may as well have been over as soon as it was scheduled. For the first half, Murray St punted more times (7), than it gained first downs (4) and trailed 28-0 at the half. They were even worse in the 2nd half, turning it over on each of their first 3 possessions in what was a 56-0 blowout. They only managed 8 first downs to Louisville’s 29 and were out-yarded 690 to 166 on the day. Louisville had 8 touchdowns, while Murray St had only 8 first downs on the day. That stat says it all. I could go on, but to be concise, the only category they won (statistically speaking) was 4th down conversions, where they went 100% (1/1) vs Lousivlle’s 75% (3/ 4). Can’t be too hard on them for this one as Louisville would turn out to be a top 25 team, who would go on to play in the ACC title game.
Games given away: (None) 24-28 loss @ Missouri State
The racers spent most of the season getting blown out, but did they have a few moments where they did have a chance to pick up some extra wins outside of lowly Presbyterian and Indiana St. Their best opportunity came at Missouri St. Each team traded three touchdowns apiece, making it 21 all at the half. The 2nd half was full of missed opportunities. To open the 3rd they missed a long field goal, and on their ensuing possession, had a golden opportunity go up 7 after getting a first and goal, but instead settled for a short field goal. The Bears would make them pay with a TD on the ensuing possession. Their offense possessed the ball six times in the 2nd half with a chance to regain the lead but instead only managed 53 total yards and two turnovers, losing 28-24.
Best Performance: (24-28 loss @ Missouri State) 41-10 win Vs Presbyterian
The Racers had a balanced attack against the Blue Hose, rushing for 231 yards and passing for 253. They opened scoring with a 39 yard rush by Kylan Galbreath and led 10-0 early before the Blue Hose tied it late in the 2nd. The Racers took the lead for good just a minute later with an 18 yard pass by QB Taylor Shields to lead 17-10 at the half. They dominated the 2nd half, scoring on three of their first four possessions to make it 41-10, which was highlighted by a 51 yard bomb from Shields to Eric Phoenix. They more than doubled Presbyterian in yards 484 to 196.
Games Stolen: (None) 30-28 win Vs Indiana State
The 1-2 Racers entered their first MVFC game as a 1.5 underdog to the 0-3 Sycamores, but managed to escape with a 30-28 victory. They opened scoring with 1st quarter safety and took advantage of the next possession with a Q’Daryius Jennings rush to make it 9-0. Indiana St managed to cut the lead to 9-7 late 2nd but the Racers scored a key rushing TD by Cortezz Jones to make it 16-7 at the half. They opened the 3rd with a huge pick six to make it 23-7. The Sycamores rallied to make it 21-23 early 4th. With the game on the line, the Racers had a 5 play 63 yard drive to extend their lead to 30-21. The Sycamores weren’t done yet as they would again cut the lead to 30-28 on the ensuing possession and forced a Racer punt with 1:42 to go. With the Sycamores only needing a field goal to win the game, the Racer defense came in clutch, forcing a turnover on downs with :31 seconds to go. It was a rough season overall, but starting 1-0 in the toughest conference in the FCS surely generated some buzz.
Playoffs: None
Overall Performance and Recap:
It wasn’t a pretty year for the MVFC’s newest member. They opened the year with a 41-10 win over lowly Presbyterian, and rounded out their non-conference schedule with FBS Louisville and Middle Tennessee, losing by 56 and 21 respectively. There was a brief moment of excitement in Valley play as they opened it with a 30-28 upset over Indiana St. From there it was all downhill as they lost their remaining 7 conference games by an average of 25.14 points. In fact, 6 of those 7 losses were by three or more scores, with their closest loss coming by 3 to #16 UND. The transition to the FCS’ toughest conference was brutal, so we’ll call it a win that they managed to finish ahead of bottom feeders Indiana St and departing member WIU.
Their passing attack was led by DJ Williams, who completed 57.6% of his passes for 1,523 yards, throwing 11 TDs and 9 interceptions. Leading receiver was Cole Rusk who had 512 yards, averaging 13.1 yards per catch, hauling in 6 TD receptions. Leading rusher was Jawaun Northington with 380 yards on 87 carries for a 4.4 yard average with two rushing TDs on the year. LB Nick Waller led the defense with 69 tackles (nice).
9 (-2). Missouri State 4-7 (3-5)
Preseason Projected: 5-7 (3-5)
Worst Performance: 28-24 win vs Murray State
Going back to my notes from Week 9 to rereview this one right at the top of my document it said “way closer than it should’ve been”. The numbers agree with me here. The Achilles’ heel in this game was the same one the Bears had for most of the year. They had an explosive passing offense, but just could not run the ball when it mattered. I figured with Jason Shelley and a few of the top receivers leaving after 2022 Missouri State would lean hard on senior Jacardia Wright. And they just never did. Seemingly through a lack of both line play and play calling the Bears committed to staying a pass first team and they almost specifically fell in snare against Murray State for it.
Other game specific notes worth mentioning again is that DE Devin Goree picked up MVFC week 8 player of the week honors for his heroics in this one. His stat line was 8 tkls, 3 solo, and 2.5 sacks.
Games given away: 35-36 loss vs Illinois State, 31-38 loss @ #25 UT Martin
It is hard to say that 6-5 would’ve put Missouri State in the playoffs by any stretch but it sure would’ve felt nice right off the bounce in what was a rebuilding year. Both these games were weird in their own ways.
If you didn’t see or don’t remember the Illinois State game was a back and forth affair that ended on a super controversial overturned 2 point conversion play. This was a game that was back and forth all day with neither defense doing much of anything.
The UT Martin game saw the Bears come back from 24-7 early to eventually tie it at 31 in the 4th but after a UT Martin score they failed just inside the 30 on their 2 minute drill. Once again an inability to run the ball and control the clock really hindered Missouri State in this one.
The other thing that was a major thorn for the season and these two games specifically was a super porous Bear defense. The Bears gave up just over 30 points per game on the season. That is going to make it hard to be competitive anywhere, but especially the Valley and it led to two wasted offensive efforts in this game.
Best Performance: 59-14 win vs Utah Tech
I don’t feel like a lot needs to be said here. The Bears waxed a bad team that they should’ve. It showed the potential of a young football team and I think that is important to put on display for your fan base when you unfortunately find yourself in a rebuilding year. Utah Tech is hardly a tough opponent, but Missouri State absolutely gets credit for doing what they should with them in all 3 phases and then some.
Games Stolen: none
Playoffs: None
Overall Performance and Recap:
As discussed in the above sections the rush offense and defense as a whole were some pretty big issues on this team. However, despite maybe not finishing with the record they could’ve I think there’s actually a good bit to be excited about if you are a Bears fan. Anyone who followed along all last season knows how big I was on Jordan Pachot after he came in to replace an injured Jacob Clark, ultimately Bledsoeing him and taking the job. However, Pachot is headed in the portal to SUU so Clark will be back in charge. However, the Bears return a ton of offensive fire power. L.D. Scott will be in his second year as the DC and I think there is a ton of opportunity for growth as the young guys get used to his system. 2023 was is not going to be an Missouri State fan’s favorite looking back, but I think they showed that they do have some pieces in place to trend back in the right direction in the coming years.
8. Illinois State 6-5 (4-4)
Pre-season projected: 6-5 (3-5)
Worst Performance: 13-14 Loss at RV Eastern Illinois
I watched the end of this one from my seat in Target field. It was just an ugly ugly loss for the Redbirds. Yes Eastern Illinois ended up a lot better than people thought they were going to be and were on the playoff bubble in October, but it was obvious to anyone that watched that Illinois State was the better team. Special teams woes and turnovers killed them here. They left 7 points on the board in the kick game and lost the turnover battle -1. That being a pick Annexstad threw on the cusp of FG range with change left on the clock.
Games given away: 13-14 loss at RV Eastern Illinois, 21-24 loss vs RV Northern Iowa
We briefly touched on the EIU game above, and to truly say this was stolen I think is a bit disingenuous, but that’s what the numbers say. Especially when the Redbirds scored a garbage time TD to make the score look closer than it had been on most of the day. What really sank their ship on this particular day from going back to my notes looks to be again losing the turnover battle in a close contest and getting very one dimensional on offense.
Best Performance: 44-7 win vs Indiana State
Very complete game against an opponent that had a very lackluster season even more so than what the Redbirds did. Nothing really to see here.
Games stolen: 36-35 win @ Missouri State
So from a numbers perspective I think saying this game was stolen is a bit of a stretch. However, if you know how this one ended you know that in reality that just may be a more true to life assessment than people know. After losing Zach Annexstad on the second to last play of the drive Tommy Rittenhouse came in to hand the ball off for a touchdown. Then Brock Spack went for 2 to end the game. Rittenhouse hit a wide open Wenkers Wright for a 2 point conversion only for him to seemingly drop it. However, the play was reviewed and very controversially overturned. Overall this game was a bit of a microcosm for the Redbird season, a steady balanced offensive attack and inconsistent defense.
Playoffs: None
Overall Performance and Recap:
The Redbirds finished 6-5 and just outside of even sitting on the playoff bubble for the second year in a row. They are going to lose some huge contributors to graduation as well in the form of Zack Annexstad, Mason Blakemore, and Daniel Sobkowicz. Annexstad and Sobkowicz graduated. I am not sure of the status of Blakemore currently as he was not listed on their 2024 roster but did have a year of eligibility left. Their defense had already been in a rebuilding year so they will look to continue to improve next season. I really want to say I feel like Illinois State could turn the corner next season especially with Tommy Rittenhouse having starting experience at QB and Wenkers Wright ready to slide back into the feature back roll, but I also think the Redbirds are staring down the barrel of a gun of being a perennial 6-5 team at this point. After 2023 where they came short of expectations 2024 could be make or break for them.
7 (-3). #12 Southern Illinois 8-5 (4-4)
Preseason projected: 8-3 (6-2)
Worst performance: 3-31 loss @ #19 Youngstown State
This was a rough day at the office for the Salukis. Nic Baker was awful. They gained 6 net yards on the ground on the day after giving up a plethora of sacks. The otherwise solid Saluki defense couldn’t stop the Penguin onslaught all day. This was hardly indicative of the capability of this team, but it was a huge let down.
Games given away: 3-31 loss @ #19 Youngstown State, 7-14 loss vs #4 South Dakota
We discussed the Youngstown game already, but as far as the South Dakota game this trended more on the spectrum of where SIU had their struggles this year. Coming into the season the big question was could the defense step up to bolster what was expected to be an explosive offense, and this dynamic basically got turned on their head. Despite an offense with tremendous athletes and a 6th year QB with preseason Payton hype in Nic Baker, the story of this team was PJ Jules and the defense. In the South Dakota game they only got into scoring position 3 times and only came away with one score. The other two being a missed FG and a pick on 4th and goal from the 2 with seconds to play. Earlier in the season SIU came as close as anyone arguably not named Montana State to upsetting the #1 Jackrabbits but had similar offensive struggles there. What was supposed to be a strength for the team in a way ended up being their weakness.
Best performance: 63-0 win @ Western Illinois
Not a lot to talk about here.Southern pounded Western from start to finish in a game that was never competitive.
Games stolen: 14-11 win @ Northern Illinois
A heroic defensive effort and an offense that was able to do just enough to eek out the win. PJ Jules was at his best and 2 other picks sealed the deal. This was huge for SIU as it extended their win streak over their directional neighbor to 2-0 in the only two games played in the last 20 years.
Playoffs: 1st Round 35-0 win vs Nicholls State, 2nd Round 17-20 OT loss @ #8 Idaho
The Saluki playoff run was probably a bit more brief than the team or their fan base desired, but I don’t think there is any shame in it at all. They handled business and drubbed Nicholls at home and then went to the Kibbie Dome for FCS Playoffs after dark and came up just short against a very good Idaho team in an all time classic. The Salukis never trailed until the untimely Vandal OT TD, but they also never could quite get away. I know the team and fan base had a little bit loftier hopes than this, but I think this was a solid run. Pending how next year’s team can capture the momentum of losing on a blocked FG in the playoffs will probably sting for a while even if it maybe shouldn’t.
Overall Performance and Recap:
As discussed in the above sections this team was kind of opposite of expectations. Everyone thought offensively they would chug right along and on the defensive side of the ball they’d have to find a way to have their high end talent be consistent week to week and it was just the opposite. In my preseason write up I put that a reasonable expectation for SIU this season would be quarterfinals and with how close they got to just that (seriously if you’re bored and homesick for football this offseason go rewatch the SIU-Idaho game especially if you missed the first go round) I am feeling confident in cashing that check. Although just shy of what they showed could be their true ceiling I think 2023 was a season SIU can and should be satisfied with. Now the question will loom large can coach Nick Hill keep it going. They were a super senior laden team especially in several key areas. The leaders and captains on both sides of the ball in Baker and Jules are going to be darn tough to replace in 2024 along with key contributors at RB, WR, and every level of the defense.
6 (-3). RV Northern Iowa 6-5 (5-3)
Preseason Projected: 8-3 (6-2)
Worst performance: 17-34 loss vs Weber State
While this looked like a respectable loss at the time in hindsight this was tough. Especially when it was tied 17 all at half and the Panthers finished -5 TO on the day, but you aren’t going to win very many games doing that. Weber State having their season end up disappointing in its own right makes this all the more disappointing. There were a lot of issues for UNI this year, and turnovers were definitely high among the priorities as highlighted here.
Games given away: 17-34 loss vs Weber State
Best performance: 27-0 win vs #16 North Dakota
UNI caught UND on a bit of let down after their huge win over arch rival NDSU, but they should still get credit for handling it. The shutout was obviously the best performance on the season for the Panther defense, but it was also to the top for yards and the eye test definitely supported that. Offensively this was also one of the more balanced efforts put out there by UNI. On top of that in one of the more fun moments of the college football season UNI’s RB depth was so poor coming into this they moved a scout team LB over and he went for 180 rush yds and 1 TD on 30 carries.
Games Stolen: 24-21 win @ Illinois State
This game just might’ve been the high point for UNI on the year, but I still don’t know that I’m sure it’s 100% fair to classify this as stolen even if the numbers say it was. The Panthers were on a 4 game win streak after this one and had the second best odds to win the MVFC, even though SDSU basically had it wrapped up. It was never as close as the final score would tell you and UNI was pretty balanced overall.
Playoffs: None
Overall Performance and Recap:
Another 6-5 season that ends before December is pretty disappointing especially for some of the hopes that UNI had for their season. I’ve also been beating around the bush, mostly because it is a bit unfair to put the blame on one person, but I’m to the point we have to put it out there. UNI had a plethora of issues, namely turnovers and one of the main contributors was Theo Day. Theo Day was one of the top FCS QB prospects coming into his season and his inconsistent play may have played him out of the NFL altogether. But to pin that on Day himself is a bit unfair. The entire team was inconsistent all year and as such the Panthers yielded inconsistent results.
Finally back to some of our guests. Up next is Kelly Howe from UNDFootball360.com. UNDFootball360.com is much like the Jackrabbit Illustrated blog, but obviously for all things UND. Kelly and the team over there do some awesome work. They are a must add to your MVFC follows on socials, give their work a look!
5. #16 North Dakota 7-5 (5-3)
Preseason projected: 7-4 (4-4)
Worst performance: 0-27 loss @ Northern Iowa
This was the letdown we all knew could happen, hoped it wouldn’t, but watched with one eye open as the game started. UND had just finally beat their in-state rival NDSU the week before. The hangover implications were abundant but most, including myself, hoped UND was going to use that big win as a springboard to finally get over the hump and reach another level. Not so much. The offense came out lethargic as a 20 year old on Saturday morning – no energy, no flow. The defense actually battled pretty well but it slowly got away from them and turned into an embarrassing 27-0 loss. UND put up a total of 187 yards vs a defense that wasn’t dominant. QB Tommy Schuster played his worst game of the season going 17-28 for 164 yards and 1 INT and a fumble.
Mind you – UND put up 49 points vs NDSU the week before. To be shutout is beyond ridiculous and some say it was downhill from that point on.
Games given away: 35-42 loss vs #13 Sac State
I am not sure UND gave this game away but they sure as hell shouldn’t have lost. We had been banging the drum that UND needs a home game in the playoffs to show what they can do. Being they are damn near unbeatable in the Alerus Center it made sense. After getting hosed the year before and getting sent out to Weber State we felt this was vindication.
Unfortunately, the Hornets had other thoughts. UND came out flat, again, and Sac State moved the ball up and down the field with very little resistance the entire first half. 28 points and 309 yards on four drives. At half on Twitter, I called it the most embarrassing defensive performance I have ever witnessed. The offense got on track in third quarter and tied up the game 28-28 heading into the fourth quarter. The energy was back in the building and the team seemed stable again. However, the offense took two sacks in a row at midfield, punted, and Sac State took over from then on.
To say the fan base was devastated would be an understatement. 6,500 fans paid $25 a pop to show up and get loud supporting their team. This loss hurt as much as any in the Bubba Schweigert era.
Best performance: 49-24 win vs #3 North Dakota State
Nobody could’ve predicted this. The Alerus Center was an electric factory from warmups on. UND hadn’t beaten NDSU since 2003 (extended break in there) and the team and fans were ready for this one from the opening kick – literally. Luke Skokna took the opening kickoff back 100 yards untouched and the roof came off the place. I have never heard it that loud in my life.
From that point on it was a back and forth battle in first half with NDSU putting together some nice offensive drives.
A key play in the game that turned the momentum was C.J. Siegels interception of Cam Miller right at start of third quarter. With the score 28-17 Hawks, Siegel returned it to the NDSU 23 and UND punched it in to make it 35-17. That appeared to take the wind out of NDSU and the Hawks never looked back.
The way UND did it was the surprising thing. They completely manhandled the Bison defense up front. Inside zone with Gaven Ziebarth was unstoppable and the Bison quit, basically. Pretty much was NDSU has done to teams for the past 20 years. UND ran for 210 yards on 39 carries and were 9-12 on third down. Grand Forks was on it’s ear that night.
Games Stolen: 49-24 win vs #3 North Dakota State
At the time I wouldn’t say it was stolen as it was a complete ass-kicking but the way the season played out I may agree. NDSU righted the ship and made a run to the semi-finals. UND never looked the same again and had a first-round exit.
Playoffs: 1st Round 35-42 loss vs #13 Sac State
Not much more to say about this one except it was a definite low point in the Bubba Schweigert era. No reason to lose this game at home. An issue with UND is they have typically peaked mid-season over the past 5-7 years. That is a problem. They are never playing their best ball in November and it shows in their record. 7-5, 7-5, 5-6, 7-5, 6-5. Those are the last five seasons of UND football.
Overall performance and recap:
UND football is becoming a bit predictable these days. Those records I just referenced show it. I have predicted 7-4 every year for a while now and I am very close or spot on each time. This season was very similar to the others. Good, not great, but left the fans wanting more. 7-5 and a first round exit has happened three times now under Schweigert. To be in the same conference as SDSU and NDSU makes that unacceptable. Why? Cause we see what can be done and what our goal is. UND has to play those two every year so the Hawks know what it takes to be a top team. No delusions of grandeur. If SDSU can become the King of FCS why can’t UND become a consistent Top 10 team?
UND was 6-1 at home and 1-4 on the road. Great at home, poor on the road. How it goes every year for the Hawks. The home games are a blast for the fans, though! We just hope for the program to finally take that next step and win some playoff games, or an FBS game, or a big road game.
Up next is Gino Leone from Penguin Nation. He is a fellow Redshirt Sports FCS media poll voter, and is often a guest feature over on Redshirt sports for all things Youngstown. Be sure to give him some love as well, and I can’t thank him enough for his contributions.
4 (+2). #19 Youngstown State 8-5 (5-3)
Preseason projected: 6-5 (3-5)
Worst Performance: 0-34 loss vs #1 South Dakota State
Everything went wrong for YSU in what was supposed to be a statement game for Doug Phillips and his resilient team. Defensively, SDSU punished YSU’s front seven with a lethal ground game led by star running back Isaiah Davis, who finished the game with 130 yards and a touchdown. Gronowski complemented the rush attack by torching a secondary that struggled all year, allowing opponents to throw for 240.54 yards per game. Gronowski concluded the contest going 19/28 for 295 yards and three touchdowns. On the offensive side of things, Mitch Davidson was inconsistent and constantly struggled to generate plays under pressure. Finishing the day with 160 yards and 1 interception, Mitch capped off what was arguably his worst game as a Penguin. The offensive line didn’t help much either; SDSU limited YSU to just 47 rushing yards and throttled the opposition up front. The special teams unit for YSU also failed to execute on a field goal attempt when it was blocked prior to halftime. This game was one of the most complete butt-kickings FCS fans witnessed throughout the course of the season.
Secondary complications: YSU’s secondary limited the ceiling of what was without a doubt the best roster Doug Phillips has assembled thus far into his tenure at Youngstown. The PA pass was utilized against the ‘Guins almost every week in order to release the ball quickly and freeze YSU’s defensive backs. Adjustments were made but the quarterbacks in the Missouri Valley continued to find ways to exploit YSU’s true weakness. Fans within the YSU community argued that the defensive line wasn’t producing enough pressure and were part of the problem. While YSU didn’t have a true breakout defensive end and lacked physicality at certain points in the season like the Villanova and SDSU game, they still managed to affect the quarterback when the opposition elected to not release the ball rapidly out of the quarterback’s hands and on the rare occasion the secondary eliminated wide receiver options. With a solid secondary, YSU could’ve potentially picked up one to two more wins in the regular season and positioned themselves for a deeper playoff run.
Best performance: 31-3 win vs #12 Southern Illinois
This was a massive win for YSU that significantly boosted their playoff resume and set the tone for the remainder of the season. The defense led the charge with a tenacious effort, sacking SIU quarterback Nic Baker seven times and allowing just 100 yards of total offense. The secondary hustled throughout the night and complemented the defensive line by locking down a solid wide receiver group. Troy Jakubec stood out in the secondary, intercepting a pass in the third quarter and encouraging his teammates to finish off the contest. YSU’s offense followed the lead of the defense by punching SIU’s defensive front right in the gut with a powerful rushing attack. Tyshon King had an excellent night, carrying the ball 22 times for 117 yards and 2 touchdowns. Dra Rushton contributed as well, adding 52 yards and 2 touchdowns to the total rushing yardage. Mitch Davidson wasn’t asked to throw the ball a lot, but he did enough to take care of business. Davidson finished the night going 14/18 for 157 yards with one interception. The special teams unit made the victory even more sweet, executing well and making little to no errors during the game. This was a huge bounce back game for the ‘Guins after a brutal conference loss the week before vs UNI.
Games stolen: 31-3 win vs #12 Southern Illinois
This win generated a ton of excitement within YSU’s fanbase and proved Doug Phillips’ doubters wrong. Defeating the #12 team in front of a good crowd on Alumni night is enough to gain the support of an entire city. The grit shown on the field resonated with many hard working middle-class citizens in the city of Youngstown and reminded many fans of the Tressel days. It was a great night to be a Penguin!
Playoffs: First Round 40-7 win vs Duquesne, Second Round 28-45 loss @ #6 Villanova
Drawing a home playoff game against Duquesne was everything YSU fans could’ve asked for. While the crowd wasn’t huge due to the Ohio State vs Michigan game being played that day and Thanksgiving festivities still carrying on, the presence of the fans at the game was definitely felt. The team didn’t overlook their competition and played outstanding in all three phases of the game. The ‘Guins cruised past the Dukes into the second round.
Unfortunately, the road would end in Philadelphia, PA vs an underestimated Villanova team. Nova dominated YSU in every aspect of the contest and pulled away in the third quarter. The loss left a sour taste in the mouths of Penguin fans, but didn’t take away from what was accomplished in 2023.
Overall Performance and Recap: This season was a huge step in the right direction for the football program at YSU. Earning a playoff berth, going 5-3 in conference play, and competing hard every week is what YSU fans wanted for the 2023 season. Doug Phillips has done phenomenal with the team and continues to rebuild a roster that took multiple steps back during Bo Pelini’s time at YSU. With dedicated players returning and the addition of multiple experienced players, YSU will aim for the top in 2024 and future years.
Our next contributor likely needs no introduction. He’s the Bison fan we tolerate. The FNN Podmaster, your unbiased Bison admin, and I think I speak for all of the guys at JI when I say our personal friend, Matthew Fraase. In case you didn’t already know you can find Matt over on the Fans Nation Network podcast and Facebook pages. Thanks for your time Matt!
3 (-1). #3 North Dakota State 11-4 (5-3)
Preseason projected: 11-1 (7-1)
Worst performance: 24-49 loss @ #16 North Dakota
North Dakota State’s worst performance of the year came at the hands of their longest rival, the North
Dakota Fighting Hawks. The Fighting Hawks took their opening kickoff in for a touchdown and never
looked back. The UND defense overwhelmed NDSU early and throughout the game. They didn’t surrender more than 36 rushing yards to any Bison running back. The leading rusher that day was Quarterback Cam Miller, who had nine carries for 48 yards. NDSU defensively needed help to stop UND on special teams, rushing and passing the ball. UND finished with six touchdowns coming from all three areas of the game. It’ s hard to find former players on social media complaining about NDSU performances or coaching. This was one of the rare times that this happened; calls for change were being echoed by the fans, media, and former players. This was a dark moment of the season for the Bison but also a turning point.
Games given away: 24-49 loss @ #16 North Dakota, 19-24 loss vs #4 South Dakota, 29-31 2OT loss @ #2 Montana
If North Dakota State losing to North Dakota felt like they were punched early and often, then the loss to
South Dakota felt like they had just rolled out of bed. NDSU started slow and predictable for nearly three
quarters in their 24-19 home loss to the Coyotes. Like the UND loss, NDSU only had a running back rush for up to 38 yards all game. Also similar to the UND loss, their leading rusher that day was Cam Miller, who had 12 carries for 65 yards. While the NDSU defense woke up in the 2 nd half, they gave up 21 points before the halfway mark. South Dakota didn’t have a rusher go for more than 49 yards on NDSU, but they passed the ball effectively and controlled the clock. NDSU was down big early, a recipe for beating the Bison. This game felt like one they had given away because everyone knew they had not shown up that day. At the final whistle, they ultimately only lost by 5 points. NDSU lost a game they should have won, but they got their second chance at the Yotes with a side of revenge in the quarterfinals later in the playoffs.
Best Performance: 34-10 win VS #12 Southern Illinois (66-3 win vs RV Drake)
North Dakota State was being questioned with three losses from everywhere and everyone. Would this
team make the playoffs? Will the coaching staff survive the season? Is the dynasty and dominance now officially over? They followed a predictable loss to South Dakota State with their season’s best
performance. The No.12 ranked Bison hosted a No. 11 ranked Southern Illinois team playing well and
finished #4 in the country in total defense. A Salukis team that got as close to beating South Dakota State as it got in 2023 with a 17-10 loss was beaten up and down by an old-school Bison performance. The 34-10 victory for NDSU felt like the Bison team of old. The defensive line swarmed, and open-field tackles weren’t missed. The offense saw rushing touchdowns from two running backs and one from Quarterback Cam Miller. Yet, in this game, we saw NDSU begin adapting to their offensive strengths, leading to their offensive success late in the season. The passing game came alive with Cam Miller throwing over 60 yards
to three different receivers. NDSU played an all-around game against SIU and never turned off the momentum gained from that performance.
Games Stolen: 35-34 OT Win @ Montana State (None)
Selecting Montana State for a game stolen isn’t downplaying NDSU or MSU regarding that matchup. For good reason, Vegas had the game as a toss-up, as both teams left it all out on the field. Both teams had struggled during big matchups throughout the regular season and found themselves matchup up in the second round of the playoffs. MSU was on the downslope after late-season struggles; NDSU found
themselves on a hot streak from early-season struggles. NDSU had games they were blown out in, or they blew the other team out all year. The only other worthy games for “stolen”; would have been South Dakota or Montana if they had pulled off the victory in either matchup. The passing game for NDSU was non-existent at Montana State. Cam Miller threw 5 of 12 for 66 yards and an interception. The Tommy Mellott show almost doomed the Bison that day, as he found the end zone 4 times, twice on the ground and twice in the air. It took late-quarter heroics of the defense sacking Montana State out of scoring range and a blocked extra point to send NDSU back to South Dakota for their blowout of the Coyotes. The “Block in Bozeman” will always be remembered; it was a cherry on top of a game that NDSU could have lost many times
throughout.
Playoffs: 1st Round 66-3 win vs RV Drake, 2nd Round 35-34 OT win @ #9 Montana State, Quarterfinals 45-17 win @ #4 South Dakota, Semifinals 29-31 2OT loss @ #2 Montana
Not seen since their first FCS playoff appearance, North Dakota State was unseeded and playing over the Thanksgiving weekend. Many viewed their lack of a seed as an advantage with how the bracket turned out.
They began with a warm-up game against nonscholarship Drake, winning 66-3, resting starters, and building off the momentum they gained late in the season. It may have been the hot hand and lack of a bye week that helped them keep pace with Montana State, who had more than a few opportunities to end the Bison season in Round 2. What could have replaced Southern Illinois for their best performance of the season was NDSU blasted South Dakota in the quarterfinals. They avenged an early season loss to the Coyotes with a 45-17 victory. It was one of those games where everything worked for one team, and that team was NDSU. North Dakota State finished its 2023 season in a double-overtime loss to No. 2 Montana. In one of the best semi-final games the FCS has seen, the Griz and Bison gave us everything we wanted in a game. Late heroics from both teams’; key players, punt returns, game-tying touchdowns, and, yes, a failed trick play. The Bison did what most FCS teams only dream of—a trip to the Semis after being unseeded and doubted.
Overall Performance and Recap:
It’s not a mystery in Fargo that it’s “National Championship or Bust”. It tends to go that way when you’ve won 17 National Championships on multiple levels, along with only three losing seasons since 1964. The 2023 team had to find their footing in the middle of the season after three losses, though. They had to adjust the offense from pure power run to utilizing playmakers on the outside. Their defense grew up late in the season and gelled at the right time for a playoff run. North Dakota State didn’t meet the preseason expectations of a likely #2 finish to South Dakota State. However, they gave fans a fun run and much to look forward to in 2023. This team’s legacy will be that they surpassed the Georgia Southern FCS playoff record of 45 wins by two, giving NDSU a 47-5 record in the FCS playoffs. For a team most claim can only win in the Fargodome, they also brought NDSU’s playoff road record to .500 at 3-3. The expectations for North Dakota State will be very high in 2024. They retained virtually their entire roster with coaching turnover and will return most of the roster and high-profile players who chose to use their 6 th -year eligibility. With a favorable home conference schedule, regardless of an off-2023 result, NDSU falling short of a trip to Frisco in 2024 will surprise many.
Our last guest feature is Coyote super fan Mark Wendt. Mark is best known for the eye chart and “having them higher” as he likes to say. Mark is a really fun X follow sports fandom aside. Thanks Mark for helping out!
2 (+7). #4 South Dakota 10-3 (7-1)
Preseason projected: 5-6 (3-5)
Worst Performance: 37-3 loss vs #1 South Dakota State (17-45 Loss Vs #3 NDSU)
With season that ended with losses to a top 10 FBS team, the unanimous #1 SDSU and a revenge seeking #3 NDSU team, it’s probably nitpicking the ‘worst’ loss this season, but I’m going with the SDSU game. Disappointing is probably the better word for it, but the hype going into this game was electric. Talks of GameDay coming to town, both teams in the Top 4 of the FCS polls going in, getting the Jacks at home- it felt like the Yotes could change the tune of a really great season to an absolutely epic one. After an early FG and an INT of eventual FCS player of the year Mark Gronkowski, nothing went right for the Yotes.
Games given away: None
Best Performance: 24-19 win @ #3 North Dakota State
Without a doubt this game changed the tone in Vermillion from ‘we should make the playoffs’ to we are capable of doing damage in the playoffs. The score doesn’t really tell the story about how USD was in complete control the vast majority of this game.
Games stolen: 24-19 win @ #3 North Dakota State, 14-7 win @ #12 Southern Illinois
To me the story here is the SIU game. Coming off the disappointment of the SDSU game the week before, many predicted a let down and perhaps that’s exactly what occurred, but Brendan Webbs deflected pass on 4th and goal secured a much needed bounce back and kept the Yotes magical season on track.
Playoffs: 2nd Round 34-24 win vs #13 Sac State, Quarterfinals 17-45 loss vs #3 North Dakota State
The win over Sac St in round 2 with Vermiracle tosser Carson Camp coming in for Sac St relatively early made for an intriguing matchup. Yotes made enough plays on both sides of the ball to secure the victory.
Quarters vs NDSU- I don’t think any Yotes fans were keen on seeing NSDU escape Montana St. Beating the Bison twice in a year proved a task too great and the Bison put to rest relatively early any idea of the Yotes moving on to Montana.
Overall performance and Recap: I’ve only left a handful of Coyote games early since buying my first season tickets in 2005, but by far the earliest I ever left was the 2022 season finale at home vs UNI during what ended in an absolute 58-14 drubbing. A year later the Yotes go from 3 wins to only 3 losses and 3 seed in the FCS playoffs. There was some talk about an “easier” schedule going into the season, but this was largely due to not playing the #2 team in FCS during the nonconf slate. The Yotes played a total of 7 ranked teams going 5-2 against them despite the ‘easier’ schedule. Such is life in the MVFC. Their only other loss coming to a top 10 FBS team in Missouri. Coach Neilson resoundingly put to rest talks of his ouster and has football fans in Yote country believing again. The question for me is this, was this a one hit wonder or can USD sustain the success and be a contender for years to come? Time will tell.
1. #1 South Dakota State 15-0 (8-0)
Preseason projected: 11-0 (8-0)
Worst performance: 20-16 win vs #9 Montana State
This feels a bit strange to have as the worst game, especially considering Montana State was #3 at the time. However, it also weirdly matched my feelings walking out of the Dana. I remember waiting a while in the lot for the awesome turn out of a crowd to clear out when I saw Brendan and Dallas standing by Chad’s truck. I hadn’t yet introduced myself to Dallas in person so I grabbed a beer and headed over. I remember not wanting to seem negative in front of the guys being so new to the group when Brendan was talking about how awesome the game was, but I kind of remember thinking to myself, “Man I just don’t know how confident I am after that one.”
Ultimately the numbers validate me here. Along with being the worst performance for expected margin it was also the fewest points the offense would muster all year by a wide berth as well as the worst defensive effort of the year from a yardage standpoint, and realistically points if you take the garbage time points out of the UND, Missouri State, NDSU, and Illinois State games. In what looked like it was going to be back in forth early got turned on its head by an uncharacteristic Mark Gronowski fumble late in the 1st quarter, and the Jacks offense would go dormant until the 3rd until an eventual perfect game winning drive from the eventual Payton winner playing a part in all 3 of the touchdowns. It is hard to say that they give out the Payton in Week 2, but they just might’ve this year as on a day when the rest of the team, especially the offense, couldn’t get out of their own way #11 willed them to victory.
Games given away: None
Best Performance: 59-0 win vs #5 Albany
What an awesome environment and an awesome game. The Dana was electric the second you walked in the tunnel and you could tell. I don’t know what you can even really say about this one that hasn’t been. The seniors made no bones about knowing this was their last time in front of Jackrabbit Nation and they went out exactly how they wanted to.
Games Stolen: None
Playoffs: 2nd Round 41-0 win vs #17 Mercer, Quarterfinals 23-12 win vs #6 Villanova, Semifinals 59-0 win vs #5 Albany, Championship 23-3 win vs #2 Montana
Apart from a minor scare against Villanova due to gale force winds more than anything it was a completely dominant playoff run for the Jacks. The Jacks played their best ball in the second season and brought home another trophy for their efforts.
Overall performance and Recap:
I saw a post on X the other day about what were the best and worst seasons of your undergrad years at your school? As someone who saw a worst of 8-5 with a second round playoff exit and a best of 9-4 with a quarterfinals loss during my years as a student I really hope the kids who graduate this May don’t take for granted what they have gotten to witness. In 4 years they will have their worst season be a semi final loss, have seen 3 title appearances, and back to back championships. I truly think Coach Rogers meant something by “The statement is the standard” and I think the winning is far from over. However, I still think we should all take a moment to sit back and take in what truly has happened the last 4 years. This is a run we’ll talk about for years and this team rightfully will be debated among the best ever at the FCS level for years to come.
That’s all I have. Thanks to all who took the time to read this year and another big shoutout to our guest contributors. I think this series got generally good feedback so as long as it is ok with the powers that be I’m definitely looking forward to bringing it back next year.
GBGBGJ
Alex
#1 SDSU
| 59 | Vs | #5 Albany | 0 | +32.90 |
| 37 | @ | #4 USD | 3 | +14.95 |
| 34 | @ | #19 YSU | 0 | +13.90 |
| 70 | Vs | RV Drake | 7 | +13.49 |
| 41 | Vs | RV UNI | 6 | +9.47 |
| 41 | Vs | #17 Mercer | 0 | +7.34 |
| 33 | Vs | #3 NDSU | 16 | +6.22 |
| 23 | Vs | #2 Montana | 3 | +6.04 |
| 40 | @ | Ill State | 21 | -2.99 |
| 42 | Vs | #16 UND | 21 | -4.52 |
| 35 | Vs | Mo State | 17 | -9.34 |
| 17 | @ | #12 SIU | 10 | -9.47 |
| 45 | Vs | Western Oregon | 7 | -9.52 |
| 23 | Vs | #6 Villanova | 12 | -10.01 |
| 20 | Vs | # 9 Montana State | 16 | -10.76 |
#4 USD
| 24 | @ | #3 NDSU | 19 | +19.77 |
| 48 | @ | WIU | 6 | +12.23 |
| 14 | @ | #12 SIU | 7 | +11.99 |
| 38 | Vs | Murray State | 7 | +7.43 |
| 35 | Vs | Lamar | 6 | +6.21 |
| 34 | Vs | #13 Sac State | 24 | +5.16 |
| 14 | Vs | #16 UND | 10 | -0.68 |
| 34 | Vs | #19 YSU | 31 | -0.99 |
| 10 | @ | (#8 FBS) Missouri | 35 | -3.14 |
| 17 | @ | Ind State | 3 | -3.87 |
| 24 | Vs | UST | 0 | -5.73 |
| 3 | Vs | #1 SDSU | 37 | -14.95 |
| 17 | Vs | #3 NDSU | 45 | -17.93 |
#3 NDSU
| 66 | Vs | RV Drake | 3 | +19.9 |
| 45 | @ | #4 USD | 17 | +17.93 |
| 38 | @ | Mo State | 10 | +14.44 |
| 34 | Vs | #12 SIU | 10 | +11.85 |
| 48 | @ | RV UNI | 27 | +9.25 |
| 35 | Vs | Eastern Wash | 10 | +5.96 |
| 44 | Vs | Maine | 7 | +2.6 |
| 52 | Vs | WIU | 7 | +0.58 |
| 35 | @ | #9 Montana State | 34 | +0.42 |
| 49 | Vs | RV Central Ark | 31 | -1.07 |
| 38 | Vs | Murray State | 6 | -2.40 |
| 29 | @ | #2 Montana | 31 | -4.64 |
| 16 | @ | #1 SDSU | 33 | -6.22 |
| 19 | Vs | #4 USD | 24 | -19.77 |
| 24 | @ | #16 UND | 49 | -25.45 |
#19 YSU
| 31 | Vs | #12 SIU | 3 | +29.94 |
| 44 | Vs | Mo State | 28 | +11.37 |
| 40 | Vs | Duquesne | 7 | +10.45 |
| 7 | @ | (#10 FBS) OH St | 35 | +8.89 |
| 52 | Vs | Valparaiso | 10 | +4.2 |
| 31 | @ | #4 USD | 34 | +0.99 |
| 34 | @ | Murray State | 17 | +0.63 |
| 41 | Vs | Ill State | 38 | -0.62 |
| 41 | @ | RV UNI | 44 | -1.14 |
| 19 | @ | Indiana State | 7 | -3.76 |
| 48 | Vs | Robert Morris | 28 | -8.97 |
| 28 | @ | #6 Villanova | 45 | -10.7 |
| 0 | vs | #1 SDSU | 34 | -13.90 |
#16 UND
| 49 | Vs | #3 NDSU | 24 | +25.45 |
| 55 | Vs | RV Drake | 7 | +17.43 |
| 37 | Vs | NAU | 22 | +10.47 |
| 49 | Vs | WIU | 10 | +7.89 |
| 21 | @ | #1 SDSU | 42 | +4.52 |
| 10 | @ | #4 USD | 14 | +0.68 |
| 45 | @ | Murray State | 31 | -1.76 |
| 22 | Vs | Ill State | 21 | -2 |
| 18 | @ | Boise State | 42 | -5.24 |
| 35 | Vs | #13 Sac State | 42 | -9.45 |
| 36 | Vs | Indiana State | 33 | -16.85 |
| 0 | @ | RV UNI | 27 | -24.44 |
RV UNI
| 27 | Vs | #16 UND | 0 | +24.44 |
| 50 | Vs | WIU | 0 | +12.13 |
| 41 | @ | Idaho State | 17 | +11.04 |
| 24 | @ | Ill State | 21 | +4.19 |
| 9 | @ | Iowa State | 30 | +3.39 |
| 44 | Vs | #19 YSU | 41 | +1.14 |
| 27 | @ | Indiana State | 20 | -8.77 |
| 27 | Vs | #3 NDSU | 48 | -9.25 |
| 6 | @ | #1 SDSU | 41 | -9.47 |
| 16 | @ | Mo State | 35 | -18.92 |
| 17 | Vs | Weber State | 34 | -21.21 |
#12 SIU
| 63 | @ | WIU | 0 | +30.89 |
| 35 | Vs | RV Nicholls State | 0 | +17.76 |
| 49 | Vs | #18 Austin Peay | 23 | +17.5 |
| 10 | Vs | #1 SDSU | 17 | +9.47 |
| 38 | Vs | Ind State | 9 | +3.97 |
| 33 | Vs | Mo State | 20 | +3.86 |
| 14 | @ | NIU | 11 | +3.27 |
| 27 | @ | Murray State | 6 | -0.41 |
| 17 | @ | #8 Idaho | 20 | -1.78 |
| 26 | @ | SEMO | 25 | -10.38 |
| 10 | @ | #3 NDSU | 34 | -11.85 |
| 7 | Vs | #4 USD | 14 | -11.99 |
| 3 | @ | #19 YSU | 31 | -29.94 |
Ill State
| 44 | Vs | Ind State | 7 | +17.66 |
| 44 | Vs | Murray State | 7 | +16.86 |
| 41 | Vs | Dayton | 0 | +6.02 |
| 21 | Vs | #1 SDSU | 40 | +2.99 |
| 48 | Vs | Lindenwood | 17 | +2.35 |
| 36 | @ | Mo State | 35 | +2.11 |
| 21 | @ | #16 UND | 22 | +2 |
| 38 | @ | #19 YSU | 41 | +0.62 |
| 21 | Vs | RV UNI | 24 | -4.19 |
| 34 | @ | WIU | 18 | -10.29 |
| 13 | @ | RV Eastern Ill | 14 | -11.67 |
Mo State
| 59 | Vs | Utah Tech | 14 | +29.12 |
| 35 | Vs | RV UNI | 16 | +18.92 |
| 48 | @ | WIU | 7 | +16.40 |
| 17 | @ | #1 SDSU | 35 | +9.34 |
| 35 | Vs | Ill State | 36 | -2.11 |
| 20 | @ | #12 SIU | 33 | -3.86 |
| 48 | @ | Kansas | 17 | -5.85 |
| 31 | @ | #25 UT Martin | 38 | -7.75 |
| 28 | @ | #19 YSU | 44 | -11.37 |
| 10 | Vs | #3 NDSU | 38 | -14.44 |
| 28 | Vs | Murray State | 24 | -14.57 |
Murray State
| 24 | @ | Missouri State | 28 | +14.57 |
| 41 | Vs | Presbyterian | 10 | +7.3 |
| 6 | @ | #3 NDSU | 38 | +2.40 |
| 31 | Vs | #16 UND | 45 | +1.76 |
| 30 | Vs | Indiana State | 28 | +0.76 |
| 14 | @ | MTSU | 35 | +0.6 |
| 6 | Vs | #12 SIU | 27 | +0.41 |
| 17 | Vs | #19 YSU | 34 | -0.63 |
| 7 | @ | #4 USD | 38 | -7.43 |
| 0 | @ | (#19 FBS) Louisville | 56 | -14.25 |
| 7 | @ | Ill State | 44 | -16.86 |
Indiana State
| 33 | @ | #16 UND | 36 | +16.85 |
| 20 | Vs | RV UNI | 27 | +8.77 |
| 27 | Vs | WIU | 6 | +6.22 |
| 3 | Vs | #4 USD | 17 | +3.87 |
| 7 | Vs | #19 YSU | 19 | +3.76 |
| 28 | @ | Murray State | 30 | -0.76 |
| 7 | @ | Indiana | 41 | -3.56 |
| 9 | @ | #12 SIU | 38 | -3.97 |
| 7 | @ | Ill State | 44 | -17.66 |
| 7 | @ | Ball State | 45 | -18.58 |
| 0 | Vs | RV Eastern Ill | 27 | -25.39 |
WIU
| 18 | Vs | Ill State | 34 | +10.29 |
| 17 | @ | SUU | 37 | +8.85 |
| 7 | @ | #3 NDSU | 52 | -0.58 |
| 40 | Vs | Lindenwood | 43 | -2.85 |
| 6 | @ | Ind State | 27 | -6.22 |
| 10 | @ | #16 UND | 49 | -7.89 |
| 21 | @ | New Mexico | 58 | -9.11 |
| 6 | @ | RV UNI | 50 | -12.13 |
| 6 | Vs | #4 USD | 48 | -12.23 |
| 7 | Vs | Mo State | 48 | -16.40 |
| 0 | Vs | #12 SIU | 63 | -30.89 |
One Response
I liked the article and the tables at the bottom but it would have been nice to explain what your ranking number was just before the tables. Also would have liked to see a W/L column for quick glance at outcomes. You were also a little inconsistent with marking FBS opponents. Thanks for your efforts though out the season, I appreciate it!